On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:

 Also, has anyone noticed the extra 'not' in Gaelan's signature? I
 suspect it's intentional sneakiness.

I'd use Hanlon's razor here, it's the kind of logic many people mess up and it seems a bit too indiscriminately destructive to be sneakiness.

No wait, it *is* correct. Yep people mess this up all right. We're talking about this text right?

I object to all intentions that do not satisfy all of these criteria:
- The intention was sent to agora-business, or agora-official if it is
related to an office held by the player making the intention.
- The intention was not sent in a way designed to prevent people from
noticing its existence.

I'm actually a bit worried about the office part though - it's not too implausible for a player to innocently include an intent that's not strictly related to an office.


Reply via email to