Never!

On 6/12/2018 12:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Stop it, stop it!  This sketch is too silly!

    OscarMeyr

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:

I actually knew that already, so I'm not sure what I was thinking when I
wrote that. Thanks for the correction, though.

-twg
​​

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On June 12, 2018 12:35 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:

​​

FYI: The Spivak pronoun nominative is "e", not "ey" (reflecting "he" and

"she"), though you can, of course, use any pronouns you want.

I favor the CFJ called by V.J. Rada in this thread.

On Tuesday, June 12, 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:

I become a party to the contract "Sillyness by contract".

I act on behalf of V.J. Rada to perform the following actions: {

Destroy 1 apple to move V.J. Rada to (0, -1).

Destroy 1 apple to move V.J. Rada to (-1, -1).

Transfer all liquid assets from the mine at (-1, -1) to V.J. Rada.

Transfer 3 stone and 2 ore from V.J. Rada to Trigon.

}

This meets the requirement of being extremely silly because it is only

necessary due to a minor grammatical error on Trigon's part, and it
meets

the requirement of not harming V.J. Rada's standing in the game

significantly because eir only loss from these actions is 2 apples
(which

ey already have plenty of) and the right to transfer assets from a

preserved facility before next Friday (which ey already have enough
assets

not to have much need of).

-twg

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On June 12, 2018 10:31 AM, Ned Strange edwardostra...@gmail.com wrote:

it doesn't, do it again

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Reuben Staley
reuben.sta...@gmail.com

wrote:

Could you guys let me do one thing in this game without pointing
out

how I

messed up?

Okay, okay. Here's a flimsy argument for why this works:

I could only possibly transfer items to myself from a facility on a

land

unit I'm on. Therefore, "that unit" should mean "the unit I'm on"
since

that's the only option for transferring. Therefore, the attempt

succeeds.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 04:13 Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:

On June 12, 2018 8:25 AM, Reuben Staley reuben.sta...@gmail.com

wrote:

I destroy a coin to make (-2, -1) black and switch the
alternating

type.

I transfer the mine on that unit's resources to myself.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this fails, because (-2,
-1)

doesn't have a mine on it, and wasn't where you were standing

anyway. I

think you meant to reference the mine at (-1, -1), but I can't
come

up with

a parsing where "that unit" refers to anything other than (-2,
-1).

-twg

--

 From V.J. Rada

--

~Corona



Reply via email to