Okay, anyone using gmail didn't receive it. However, this can't just be
gmail's fault, because plenty of people who aren't using gmail also haven't
received it. I'm quite confused. It would be great if those who have
received the messages could look at the headers and see if anything looks
different from pre-problem OFF and the other lists, because this is just
weird.

-Aris

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 4:17 PM Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> same
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:41 AM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The original message? No, I haven't received it.
> >
> > On 6/15/2018 4:45 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >>
> >> Poll: Who has and hasn't received the email? Please reply, and we'll use
> >> the honor system.
> >>
> >> -Aris
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:43 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Oops. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one has been resolved. I retract my
> >>>
> >>> prior
> >>>>
> >>>> CFJ, and CFJ "Proposal 8050 has been resolved."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Gratuitous:  The email in question was delivered to my own inbox via
> the
> >>> list
> >>> reasonably quickly after I sent it.  I'm including the full headers
> below
> >>> in
> >>> case it helps interpret anything:
> >>>
> >>> Return-Path: <agora-official-boun...@agoranomic.org>
> >>> Received: via tmail-2007f.22 (invoked by user kerim) for
> >>> kerim+mail/agora;
> >>> Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
> >>> Received: from mxe29.s.uw.edu (mxe29.s.uw.edu [173.250.227.18])
> >>>       by cg04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW16.03) with
> ESMTP
> >>> id w5EImGAx024904
> >>>       for <ke...@kerim.deskmail.washington.edu>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018
> >>> 11:48:16
> >>> -0700
> >>> Received: from vps.qoid.us ([71.19.146.223])
> >>>       by mxe29.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW16.03) with SMTP id
> >>> w5EIm5nl013556
> >>>       for <ke...@u.washington.edu>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:48:05 -0700
> >>> Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2018 18:48:04
> -0000
> >>> Received: from vps.qoid.us (127.0.0.1)
> >>>     by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 14 Jun 2018 18:48:04 -0000
> >>> Delivered-To: agn-agora-offic...@agoranomic.org
> >>> Received: (qmail 25977 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2018 18:48:02
> -0000
> >>> Received: from mxout21.s.uw.edu (140.142.32.139)
> >>>    by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 14 Jun 2018 18:48:02 -0000
> >>> Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu
> >>> [140.142.234.163])
> >>>    by mxout21.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW16.03) with ESMTP id
> >>>    w5EIlNUY013073
> >>>    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
> >>> verify=OK)
> >>>    for <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:47:23
> -0700
> >>> X-Auth-Received: from hymn01.u.washington.edu (hymn01.u.washington.edu
> >>>    [140.142.9.110]) (authenticated authid=mailadm)
> >>>    by smtp.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW16.03) with ESMTP
> id
> >>>    w5EIlNOo032150
> >>>    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
> >>>    for <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:47:23
> -0700
> >>> X-UW-Orig-Sender: mail...@smtp.washington.edu
> >>> X-Auth-Received: from [161.55.36.23] by hymn01.u.washington.edu via
> HTTP;
> >>>    Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:47:23 PDT
> >>> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
> >>> From: Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> >>> To: Agora Official <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org>
> >>> Message-ID: <
> alpine.lrh.2.01.1806141147230.22...@hymn01.u.washington.edu>
> >>> User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20)
> >>> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
> >>> X-PMX-Version: 6.4.3.2751440, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409,
> >>> Antispam-Data: 2018.6.14.183916, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.49.1,
> >>> AntiVirus-Data:
> >>> 2018.4.20.5491003
> >>> X-PMX-Server: mxe29.s.uw.edu
> >>> X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=
> >>>    REPLYTO_FROM_DIFF_ADDY 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05,
> >>> BODY_SIZE_6000_6999 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, DQ_S_H 0,
> >>> NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0,
> >>>       NO_URI_HTTPS 0, RDNS_NXDOMAIN 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC
> 0,
> >>> SPF_NONE 0, __CP_NOT_1 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0,
> >>> __DQ_IP_FSO_LARGE 0, __DQ_S_HIST_1 0,
> >>>       __DQ_S_HIST_2 0, __DQ_S_IP_MC_5_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_SD_1_P 0,
> __HAS_FROM
> >>> 0, __HAS_LIST_HEADER 0, __HAS_LIST_HELP 0, __HAS_LIST_ID 0,
> >>> __HAS_LIST_SUBSCRIBE 0,
> >>>       __HAS_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_REPLYTO 0,
> >>> __INVOICE_MULTILINGUAL 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0,
> >>> __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0,
> >>>       __MIME_VERSION 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0,
> >>> __STOCK_PHRASE_24 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0,
> __TO_NAME
> >>> 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0,
> >>>       __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __USER_AGENT 0
> >>> Subject: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8050-8052
> >>> X-BeenThere: agora-offic...@agoranomic.org
> >>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
> >>> Precedence: list
> >>> List-Id: "Agora Nomic reports, etc. \(PF\)"
> >>> <agora-official.agoranomic.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> List-Unsubscribe: <
> >>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/agora-official>,
> >>>    <mailto:agora-official-requ...@agoranomic.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>> List-Archive: <
> >>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/>
> >>> List-Post: <mailto:agora-offic...@agoranomic.org>
> >>> List-Help: <mailto:agora-official-requ...@agoranomic.org?subject=help>
> >>> List-Subscribe: <
> >>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agora-official>,
> >>>    <mailto:agora-official-requ...@agoranomic.org?subject=subscribe>
> >>> Reply-To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
> >>> Errors-To: agora-official-boun...@agoranomic.org
> >>> Sender: "agora-official" <agora-official-boun...@agoranomic.org>
> >>> X-Sophos-SenderHistory:
> >>>
> >>>
> ip=71.19.146.223,fs=117188,da=5528554,mc=8,sc=0,hc=8,sp=0,fso=5001784,re=1,sd=4,hd=8
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I resolve the Agoran Decisions to adopt Proposals 8050-8052 as follows.
> >>> Quorum is 6 for all of these proposals.
> >>>
> >>> [Remainder of message cut]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:34 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Er, might want to check the Proposal # in the CFJ statement...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll re-send the resolution to converge the gamestate in case it
> failed
> >>>>> before.  I think the only things I did for zombies were
> >>>
> >>> announcements-of-
> >>>>>
> >>>>> intent so I don't think the time difference breaks anything (yet!)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just checked the unofficial OFF mail archive. The message got eaten
> >>>
> >>> on
> >>>>>
> >>>>> its
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> way to me, and maybe some other people, but definitely went to,
> >>>
> >>> which is
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> super scary.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I CFJ "Proposal 1905 has been resolved."
> >>>>>> Arguments:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Per CFJ 1905, non-receipt of a message by those who have arraigned
> to
> >>>>>> receive messages via the forum is grounds to regard actions taken
> >>>
> >>> therein
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> as invalid. My spam filter didn't eat it (I've checked, and it's
> >>>
> >>> also set
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> never to eat Agora stuff) so it probably never entered my technical
> >>>>>
> >>>>> domain
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> of control.
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We really need to figure out these server problems ASAP.
> >>>>>> -Aris
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:06 PM Aris Merchant <
> >>>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Did you ever resolve proposal 8050? I certainly can't find a
> >>>>>
> >>>>> resolution...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Aris
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:09 AM Kerim Aydin <
> >>>
> >>> ke...@u.washington.edu>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You couldn't have anyway because PLEDGES CAN NO LONGER BE
> >>>
> >>> DESTROYED,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WITHOUT OBJECTION OR OTHERWISE.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> They can't be destroyed at all because they're no longer assets.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> read
> >>>>>>>> Proposal 8050 - the only way for a pledge to end is to time out
> >>>
> >>> (and
> >>>>>
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> doesn't outright "destroy" it, it just makes it untracked and
> >>>>>>>> non-punishable).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> T.T I couldn't have acted on that intent any earlier than next
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tuesday,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> the dynasty will definitely be over by then.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ~Corona
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Cuddle Beam <
> >>>
> >>> cuddleb...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I object to Corona’s attempt, because the dynasty isn’t over
> >>>
> >>> just
> >>>>>
> >>>>> yet
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (will
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> be soon though).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 06:35, Corona <
> >>>
> >>> liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Without objection I intend to retract every pledge I own.
> >>>
> >>> (the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> BlogNomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> one is no longer useful, too)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ¯Corona
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:02 AM, Ned Strange <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> edwardostra...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Without objection I intend to retract each pledge I own.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Kerim Aydin <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ke...@u.washington.edu>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The below pledge list from the June 3 Referee Report
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> self-ratified
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> prior
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to Proposal 8050 taking effect.  The pledge dates (date
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> tracking now
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> required by the Notary) don't self-ratify, but I did go
> >>>>>
> >>>>> back and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> confirm.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searching for 'pledge' in public archives back to March
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> revealed no
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> recent pledges.  Pledges older than 60 days no longer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> require
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> tracking.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> =the Referee, whose next report will be shorter=
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PLEDGES (self-ratifying list of assets)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> == Trigon - Created 01 Jun 2018 07:35:31
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to use as much integrity as is possible
> >>>
> >>> whenever I
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> generate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> random numbers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> == Corona - Created 27 May 2018 17:29:28
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to do all of the following in Blognomic's
> >>>
> >>> current
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> dynasty:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -always ahoy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gams
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -call hunts most of the time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -not change derrick’s or Cuddlebeam’s position if they
> >>>>>
> >>>>> perform
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> duties
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> adequately (scrubbing, joining hunts if healthy…)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -scrub the decks whenever I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> am online and can do so
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -generally work toward the preservation of the ship and
> >>>
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> lives of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> sailors, and maximizing profits
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> == G. - Created 10 May 2018 15:39:57
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge that I will not make any bids on behalf of
> >>>
> >>> zombies
> >>>>>
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> May
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018 zombie auction.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ===(below pledges were created prior to 01 Apr 2018)===
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Quazie -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to give 1 Shiny to the first person who can,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> correctly, with e-mail citations, explain what I did
> >>>
> >>> wrong
> >>>>>
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan 20th 2009 that has since led to me being a
> >>>
> >>> fugitive. For
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the explanation to be valid for this pledge, it should
> >>>
> >>> be
> >>>>>
> >>>>> fully
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> self contained, I should not have to go look up past
> >>>
> >>> rules
> >>>>>
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> order to understand the explanation (So please, include
> >>>
> >>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> source info in the explanation).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> V.J Rada -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge not to make any thread titles completely
> >>>
> >>> unrelated
> >>>>>
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the email's content, nor use any agency or other
> >>>
> >>> mechanism
> >>>>>
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to gain control of any player at the exclusion
> >>>
> >>> of
> >>>>>
> >>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other players.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gaelan (14 Sep 2017) -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to, for at least the next month, vote AGAINST
> >>>
> >>> any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> proposal that amends rules by providing new text in full
> >>>>>
> >>>>> unless
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the text of the rule is nearly entirely changed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nichdel -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to vote AGAINST on all proposals created or
> >>>
> >>> pended
> >>>>>
> >>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuddle Beam.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nichdel -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to Object to all intentions by Cuddle Beam
> >>>
> >>> that I
> >>>>>
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> object to.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nichdel -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to give a trust token and 5 shinies (as soon as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible) to any other player who also performs the
> >>>
> >>> above
> >>>>>
> >>>>> three
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pledges, except Cuddle Beam.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nichdel -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to not refer to 天火狐 as Josh or Josh T.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I too pledge to not refer to 天火狐 as Josh or Josh T.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I...pledge to fix the margins, if the issue is
> >>>
> >>> explained to
> >>>>>
> >>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to deputize for the rulekeepor on October 19,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2017, if
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> it is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> still possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuddlebeam -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to hook people up in a reasonable amount of
> >>>
> >>> time,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> according
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the message above, during what's left of the current
> >>>>>
> >>>>> month
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> November.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [Referee's note: This pledge refers to the message
> >>>
> >>> listed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> athttps://www.mail-archive.com/agora
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> business at agoranomic.org/msg30230.html]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> V.J. Rada -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to give a win and a black ribbon to everyone
> >>>
> >>> who
> >>>>>
> >>>>> votes
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "hopefully you guys all vote for this" if that passes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> o - (Nov 7, '17)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to pay 5 sh. to the first person to publicly
> >>>>>
> >>>>> identify
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific bug I fixed in the Surveyor’s report this week,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> provided
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> their answer includes either the word, some synonym for
> >>>
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> word, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> some observation related to the word, whose sha256 hash
> >>>
> >>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> e2c2bf1fdea49d1d90f7e17ac158016862f213b42f88b760aee47f697205d83a,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that I will disclose the word as part of the reward if
> >>>
> >>> it is
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> collected.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> o -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to distribute the payment in a timely fashion
> >>>
> >>> if
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> CFJ
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> finds that CuddleBeam’s payment did, in fact, occur.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [Referee's note: e's referring to a payment made by
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cuddlebeam
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> accordance with the rule "Poetry Duel Challenge Writ",
> >>>>>
> >>>>> which is
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> subject of a currently unnassigned CFJ. I would
> >>>
> >>> appreciate
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> if you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> guys created pledges with the context included in them.]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trigon -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge that if I do not win the election for
> >>>
> >>> Rulekeepor, I
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> will put
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> myself up as a candidate for this election.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [Referee's note: E's referring to the Fearmongor
> >>>
> >>> election
> >>>>>
> >>>>> on 6
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nov
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> V.J. Rada -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to, weekly, if I am Referee, publish a document
> >>>>>
> >>>>> called
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Pledges you should withdraw", listing pledges that have
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> already been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> completed or are impossible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> V.J. Rada -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge not to point any fingers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexis -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I pledge to transfer 5 shinies to the author of the
> >>>
> >>> first
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> proposal
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> gives the Rulekeepor authority, under Cleanup Time, to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> additionally
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, at least: missing periods at the end of
> >>>
> >>> sentences,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> inconsistently
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> spelled game terminology, and pronoun use (including
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> inappropriate
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> use
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Spivak pronouns in plural contexts).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Corona -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I also pledge not to use such pretentious words in the
> >>>>>
> >>>>> future.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OscarMeyr -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If nominated[Referee's note: for Herald?], I pledge not
> >>>
> >>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> qualify.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>  From V.J. Rada
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>

Reply via email to