"I speak to the capitalists who continue to buy zombies, and to the
most impoverished who don't have the money to." Best sentence in here.

On 6/17/2018 6:07 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I destroy 3 incense to expunge 3 blots from myself. My formal apology
follows.

Holding an office is potentially the largest responsibility any Agoran
citizen can willingly take upon themselves. Abusing such a responsibility
is not only an insult to the Spirit of the Game, but to fellow Agoran
citizens and the office which an Agoran holds. Unfortunately, I must admit
that I am responsible of this crime. I have disgraced the Spirit of the
Game, the office if Cartographor, but most importantly, I have disgraced
you all. In this apology, I speak to friends and enemies alike. I speak to
the holders of the most important offices, and to those who have never even
run. I speak to the capitalists who continue to buy zombies, and to the
most impoverished who don't have the money to. I speak to those who bid in
every land auction with surprising regularity. And, I speak to every single
person that lies in between the two extremes. I am truly sorry. Please
forgive me. I'll try to get another report out tomorrow. You have but hours
before the land auction ends, so please bid. I realize now this is more of
an advertisement than an apology at this point. Therefore, I also apologise
for making this into an advertisement. I apologize for treating Agora as a
joke sometimes.

Finally, I apologise if this wasn't necessary and for not looking at the
rules to check if it was.


On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 14:50 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     The Police Blotter (Referee's Weekly Report)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of last report: 03 Jun 2018
Date of this report: 17 Jun 2018
(all times UTC)

Note:  Corona at one point did this:
         "I destroy 6 incense to expunge my 6 blots."
At that point, my records show e only had 4 Blots, because my attempt to
impose Summary Judgement on em had failed (no crime specified).  If that's
correct, my interpretation is that e paid 6 incense to destroy 4 blots,
because of the special way that expunging works (R2555):
        If expunging blots would
        reduce a person's blots to less than 0, their blots are instead
        reduced to 0 but the cost of expunging, if any, is not reduced.
An alternate interpretation is that the whole exchange failed (I can't
see any arguments that only 4 incense were destroyed).  Discussion or
CFJ on the matter welcome if desired.


BLOT HOLDINGS (asset record - self-ratifying)

Person        Blots
------------  -----
Murphy           4
V.J. Rada        2
Trigon           3
Kenyon          10


BLOT HISTORY

Person        Change  Date                  Reason
------------  ------  --------------------  -------------------
V.J. Rada      -1     01 May 2018 03:46:51  Apology
G.             +1(f)  20 May 2018 23:49:32  Late Registrar Weekly
Corona         +1(f)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late Treasuror Weekly
Trigon         +1(f)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late Cartographer Weekly
Corona         +1(f)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late Herald Weekly
Kenyon         +1(D)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late SLR
Corona         +2(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Treasuror Weekly
Trigon         +2(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Cartographer Weekly
Kenyon         +3(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late SLR
Murphy         +1(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late ADoP Weekly
Murphy         +1(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Arbitor Weekly
V.J. Rada      +1(f)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Notary Weekly
G.             -1     03 Jun 2018 18:46:43  with incense
(time of last report)
Corona         -4     12 Jun 2018 18:54:37  with incense (overpaid)
ATMunn         +2(f)  13 Jun 2018 15:56:29  Late Tailor Monthly
Kenyon         +2(f)  13 Jun 2018 15:56:29  Late Rulekeepor Monthly
Corona         +3(f)  13 Jun 2018 16:00:17  Late Treasuror Weekly
Kenyon         +4(f)  13 Jun 2018 16:00:17  Late Rulekeepor Weekly
Corona         -3     13 Jun 2018 16:22:32  with incense
ATMunn         -2     13 Jun 2018 16:32:51  with incense

(f)=forgivable by R2557
(D)=loses next monthly salary for noted office by R2559


FROM THE POLICE SCANNER (details of justice since last report)

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On behalf of ATMunn (via contract) I point the finger at the
following players for missing a weekly report last week:

Corona, for Treasuror (last on May 5).

I levy a fine of 3 blots (3rd straight blotting for this), forgivable
(report produced since this offense).

Kenyon, for Rulekeepor (last Apr 7).

I levy a fine of 4 blots (4th straight blotting for this), forgivable
(salary no longer an issue).


On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On behalf of ATMunn (via contract) I point the finger at the following
players for missing a monthly report in May:

ATMunn (For Tailor).

I levy a fine of 2 Blots (Forgivable, as report has been made).

Kenyon (For Rulekeepor FLR).

I levy a find of 2 Blots (Forgivable, because salary isn't an issue
for em anymore).

I think appropriate level for missing monthlies is 2 Blots (open for
discussion).

I won't levy for 4 days at least, if a report has been made in that
time this will be forgivable, otherwise unforgivable.



==============================================================




On Jun 17, 2018 14:50, "Kerim Aydin" <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     The Police Blotter (Referee's Weekly Report)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of last report: 03 Jun 2018
Date of this report: 17 Jun 2018
(all times UTC)

Note:  Corona at one point did this:
         "I destroy 6 incense to expunge my 6 blots."
At that point, my records show e only had 4 Blots, because my attempt to
impose Summary Judgement on em had failed (no crime specified).  If that's
correct, my interpretation is that e paid 6 incense to destroy 4 blots,
because of the special way that expunging works (R2555):
        If expunging blots would
        reduce a person's blots to less than 0, their blots are instead
        reduced to 0 but the cost of expunging, if any, is not reduced.
An alternate interpretation is that the whole exchange failed (I can't
see any arguments that only 4 incense were destroyed).  Discussion or
CFJ on the matter welcome if desired.


BLOT HOLDINGS (asset record - self-ratifying)

Person        Blots
------------  -----
Murphy           4
V.J. Rada        2
Trigon           3
Kenyon          10


BLOT HISTORY

Person        Change  Date                  Reason
------------  ------  --------------------  -------------------
V.J. Rada      -1     01 May 2018 03:46:51  Apology
G.             +1(f)  20 May 2018 23:49:32  Late Registrar Weekly
Corona         +1(f)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late Treasuror Weekly
Trigon         +1(f)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late Cartographer Weekly
Corona         +1(f)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late Herald Weekly
Kenyon         +1(D)  27 May 2018 19:14:05  Late SLR
Corona         +2(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Treasuror Weekly
Trigon         +2(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Cartographer Weekly
Kenyon         +3(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late SLR
Murphy         +1(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late ADoP Weekly
Murphy         +1(D)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Arbitor Weekly
V.J. Rada      +1(f)  31 May 2018 17:04:45  Late Notary Weekly
G.             -1     03 Jun 2018 18:46:43  with incense
(time of last report)
Corona         -4     12 Jun 2018 18:54:37  with incense (overpaid)
ATMunn         +2(f)  13 Jun 2018 15:56:29  Late Tailor Monthly
Kenyon         +2(f)  13 Jun 2018 15:56:29  Late Rulekeepor Monthly
Corona         +3(f)  13 Jun 2018 16:00:17  Late Treasuror Weekly
Kenyon         +4(f)  13 Jun 2018 16:00:17  Late Rulekeepor Weekly
Corona         -3     13 Jun 2018 16:22:32  with incense
ATMunn         -2     13 Jun 2018 16:32:51  with incense

(f)=forgivable by R2557
(D)=loses next monthly salary for noted office by R2559


FROM THE POLICE SCANNER (details of justice since last report)

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On behalf of ATMunn (via contract) I point the finger at the
following players for missing a weekly report last week:

Corona, for Treasuror (last on May 5).

I levy a fine of 3 blots (3rd straight blotting for this), forgivable
(report produced since this offense).

Kenyon, for Rulekeepor (last Apr 7).

I levy a fine of 4 blots (4th straight blotting for this), forgivable
(salary no longer an issue).


On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On behalf of ATMunn (via contract) I point the finger at the following
players for missing a monthly report in May:

ATMunn (For Tailor).

I levy a fine of 2 Blots (Forgivable, as report has been made).

Kenyon (For Rulekeepor FLR).

I levy a find of 2 Blots (Forgivable, because salary isn't an issue
for em anymore).

I think appropriate level for missing monthlies is 2 Blots (open for
discussion).

I won't levy for 4 days at least, if a report has been made in that
time this will be forgivable, otherwise unforgivable.



==============================================================

Reply via email to