Whoops. Sorry, I missed those in my proposals. Free Tournaments are just plain broken, because, as you say the rules require an officer. The birthday tournament should still work though. The dubious section is "By doing so e promulgates those regulations as a special temporary title of the ACORN. This title may thereafter be amended only by the Herald or eir designee without objection, to correct minor typos." There is no longer an ACORN, and we can't tell from textual context what it would mean for there to be one, so it fails to work as intended. The next sentence could behave in one of two ways. 1) Sentence 1 has failed completely, so there's no such thing as a title. Sentence 2 fails. 2) Sentence 1 succeeds in defining something called a "title of the ACORN", and putting these proposals in it. Sentence 2 works.
Which one of those is the case is academic unless you try to amend the regulations. I'll write up a fix proposal when I get a chance, and I'm planning another distribution soon. -Aris On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > So the Tournament rules still reference the ACORN. Further, the new > definition of Regulations requires an Officer while Free Tournaments > implies that no officer is needed for that kind of Tournament. > > Aris, can you give a read of the tournament rules w.r.t. the new > Regulations rule and opine on whether they plug in nicely to the new > regulations rule despite referencing an undefined ACORN - if something > is broken I'd like to know now please. > > >