Sorry, R2162 is pretty clear here:
That officer's (weekly, if not specified
otherwise) report includes the value of each instance of that
switch whose value is not its default value; a public document
purporting to be this portion of that officer's report is
self-ratifying, and implies that other instances are at their
default value.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> We could pull out the old trick where the document ratifying doesn't
> change anything, because the document doesn't *explicitly* say that
> there are no other offices.
>
> -Aris
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:17 PM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > *sigh* nvm there was an ADoP published to BAK on June 17, which was
> > just after the proposal made omd the Distributor, so that was the
> > one that would have self-ratified (unless someone CoE'd on that one).
> >
> > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > Actually, we've got a few hours to spare on this part, it hasn't
> > > self-ratified quite yet:
> > >
> > > Claim of Error on the ADoP Report that was published on July 2 (UTC):
> > > Distributor is an Office with an officholder of omd.
> >
> >
> >
>
