Isn't there a rule such that "arguments SHALL be sorted by docket by the submitter or as being PROCEDURAL"?
~Corona On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > Persons who haven't entered yet still have a few hours! > > > #5 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 7 Jul 2018 19:34:47 -0400 > In the interest of bringing all evidence and opinions to the discussion, > Acknowledging the burden of maintaining Counselorship, > I request that the court allow Strangers (defined, in these rules as > non-Counselors) to submit evidence and opinions to the court. Such > evidence or opinions should be analysed by all counselors in the > production of their further arguments. > > THE JUDGE RULES > Counsellor, this is VALID. However, what makes you think there are > *any* non-counsellors in this courtroom? > Style: 1.0 > > #6 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 7 Jul 2018 19:54:14 -0400 > In the interest of maintaining decorum, as required by FRC-1, I ask > that the court require all Counselors and strangers to address each > other with the deserved respect. Thus, all Counselors SHALL address > each other in arguments, as My Fellow Counselor. The Right Honourable > Judge G. SHALL be referred to as such, by all Counselors in all > arguments. Holders of Nomic degrees who are Strangers higher than an > Associate of Nomic SHALL be addressed, by all Counselors in all > arguments, as The Learned for a Bachelor of Nomic, The Right Learned > for a Master of Nomic, or The Most Learned for any Doctorate of Nomic. > Holders of the patent title, "Champion", who are Strangers SHALL be > addressed, by all Counselors in all arguments, as The Victorious. > Holders of any Heroic patent title who are Strangers SHALL be > addressed, by all Counselors in all arguments, as The Heroic, or if a > Hero of Agora, the Right Heroic, or if a Grand Hero of Agora, the Most > Heroic. Any current officers of Agora who are Strangers SHALL be > addressed, by all Counselors in all arguments, as The Honourable. Any > current or former Distributor of Agora SHALL be addressed, by all > Counselors in all arguments, as The Right Honourable. I hope that > these rules of Decorum should please the court. > > THE JUDGE RULES > VALID. We've heard from you a considerable amount, Counsellor. Please > take a seat until someone else has had a chance to speak. > STYLE: 0.0 > > OOC Comment > In the Original FRC, Style "wins" award a very minor boon, so repeated > entries to increase style aren't really a thing. Here, since a style > win is equivalent to a validity win, repeated entries for style is a > bit of a loophole. TO COUNTERACT THAT, from henceforth, the *maximum* > Style I will award any "in a row" VALID entries from one person will > be 0. (does not apply if you're following up after an INVALID entry). > > > > >