"eksallance" is not a quirky spelling?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:13 AM Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The above rule is invalid: no quirky spelling
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court:
> >
> > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal
> > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In
> > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he
> > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that
> > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated.
> >
> > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections
> > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue
> > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe
> > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty
> > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most
> > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come
> > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding
> > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to
> > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding
> > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient
> > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the
> > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the
> > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested
> > nomics.
> >
> --
> From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to