I intended it to be an indirect quotation, but I'm not sure that will
hold up. If it doesn't I will resubmit the argument with the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:55 PM Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Possibly INVALID: not referring to Agora properly, though this is an
> indirect speech quotation, so it may not count.
> > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In
> >

Reply via email to