Oops. That's not a mandate and there's no retracting fines, but
acknowledged, and I apologize. I thought it was only Christmas.

There is a rule that says that fines are not effective if the
punishment imposed is manifestly inappropriate but that's only for the
value of the fine, so there's no challenging these fines in court, but
to be equitable, I suppose some remedy could be found where I write
your apologies for you or something.

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
<p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please note Rule 1769 and the fact that it applies to all of these violations.
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:09 AM Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> There is one person recently late on reports (myself) and three people
>> very late on CFJs. One of them is Gaelan, a zombie, but the other two
>> are PSS and ATMunn, who have no excuse. Those CFJs were assigned on 24
>> June, and therefore became late on the 2nd of July. As today is just
>> within the 14-day deadline for that time, I impose Summary Judgement
>> on them. (By the way, Murphy emself has a SHALL obligation that e has
>> missed to reassign these but I regard that as less important.
>>
>> I impose summary judgement on
>> -Myself for not lodging a Referee Weekly Report last week
>> -PSS for failing to judge the CFJ numbered 3645
>> -ATMunn for failing to judge CFJ 3648
>>
>> The penalties I levy are as follows
>> -I levy a 1-blot fine on myself, varying down from the Class-2 default
>> because the conduct was unintentional and there was no new information
>> to report. I designate this fine as forgivable and I designate the
>> apology word "is".
>> -I levy a 1-blot fine on PSS. I find that failing to judge a CFJ,
>> which does not have a Class attached, is generally deserving of the
>> lowest possible fine. I designate this fine as forgivable with the
>> apology word "I".
>> -I levy a 1-blot forgivable fine with the word "did" on ATMunn for the
>> same reasons as above.
>>
>> --
>> From V.J. Rada



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to