We used to have three kinds of CFJs with different procedures and standards
of evidence, inquiry cases (the generic default), criminal cases (self-
explanatory) and equity cases (for contract disputes).
I suppose you could argue that this makes "inquiry case" the only existing
subtype of CFJ rather than it being synonymous, but that's kind of silly.
I think this is the first (or most substantial that I've noticed) "dialect"
change that R2221 has been used for. Don't have a problem with it though.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2201, "Self-Ratification", by
> replacing all occurrences of "inquiry case" with "Call for Judgement". An
> "inquiry case", by game custom, appears to be synonymous with a CFJ, but it
> isn't rule-defined (any more?) and having it in there only confuses things.
> In my opinion, anyway. Feel free to object if you disagree for some reason.
>
> While I'm at it, I also intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2532,
> "Zombies", by replacing "Call fo Judgement" with "Call for Judgement". This
> one seems utterly uncontroversial.
>
> -twg
>
