No, actually, while I was taking exception to your "always" statement,
I'm cool to play with free proposals for a while. Just, y'know,
not "always".
I actually removed it that first sentence then initially then edited
it back - I thought that if a promotor was required to distribute
everything, the only way a proposal would be there after 14 days is
if it got stuck through some weird weird loophole. But if that
happens it could always be ratified out I guess!
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> You probably just want to strike the first sentence. This would allow
> the Promotor to delay distributing a proposal and then remove it. I
> also haven't run a consistency check on this yet.
>
> I know this is partly (probably mostly) a manifestation of your
> frustration, but I actually agree with it.
>
> -Aris
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:52 PM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I submit and pend the following Proposal, 'Pending is Pointless", AI-3:
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Amend Rule 2350 (Proposals) by deleting "is not pending and" from
> > the following sentence:
> > The Promotor CAN remove a proposal from the Proposal Pool by
> > announcement if it is not pending and has been added to the Pool
> > more than 14 days ago.
> >
> >
> > Repeal Rule 2445 (How to Pend a Proposal).
> >
> >
> > Amend Rule 1607 (Distribution) by deleting:
> > The Promotor SHALL NOT
> > distribute proposals which are not pending.
> > and by replacing:
> > distribute all pending proposals except
> > with:
> > distribute all proposals in the Proposal Pool except
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
