On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:10 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > Overall this is nice! Haven't read others' comments so don't know if > these have come up, but just a couple points. > > > Create a new Power 1.7 Rule entitled "Guilt", with the following text: > > > > The correct verdict is the first appropriate listed verdict. A > > verdict is appropriate if and only if the conditions specified for > > it are met. The Adjudicator is ENCOURAGED to list any verdicts, > > other than the correct one, which e believes to be appropriate. > > The possible verdicts are as follows: > > I'm not sure about this proliferation of verdicts. In a previous system, > many of your categories are actually done in the Sentencing phase. > E.g. "Guilty/not guilty" was a finding of fact and the law, but there > was a [GREEN CARD EQUIVALENT] in the sentencing phase because the action > was Justified, or Untimely, or Unaware, etc. That's intresting. I'd like to keep the sentencing phase to the actual determination of the penalty and settle other issuenin the verdict phase. I think the cascading format solves any problems that putting those in the verdict phase might otherwise cause. Do you see any I’ve missed? > > > > - INFAMY N, N blots are created in the Defendant's possession. > > > > - SHAME N, > > Don't forget to adjust R2559 (paydays) for the new language here. Will do, thanks. -Aris > >
