On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
- With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1 with a
minimum of 1. ("With Consent" is shorthand for this method with N =
"With Agoran Consent". Consent has other meanings so not good to leave it
OPINIONS ON DEPENDENT ACTIONS (new rule. Power?)
This seems a lot more verbose than the current phrasing, just to make it
Opinion is an untracked [active?] player-intent pair switch, with
possible values Neutral (default), Supporting, and Objecting. A player
CAN flip any of eir opinion switches to any value by announcement,
except that they CANNOT flip it to Supporting or Objecting if it has
previously held that value.
RESOLVING DEPENDENT ACTIONS (retitle 2124, Agoran Satisfaction)
A player (the performer) CAN, by announcement, perform a dependent
action for which an intent exists, subject to the following conditions:
This makes the authorizing Rule much less prominent in the mechanism (to
the point of not even mentioning it). Currently it's the authorizing Rule
which actually _allows_ the actions, with the dependent action rules only
I worry that this CAN may mess up precedence, e.g. by applying with the
full power of rule 2124, even if the authorizing rule has much lower
This shouldn’t change any function—I just changed some things to take
advantage of modern Agoran concepts.
You removed the provision from rule 1728 that the actor (um, I thought
that term was supposed to have been amended to "performer") SHOULD publish
a list of supporters and objectors.
You removed several provisions from rule 2124:
* The provision that allows the authorizing document to restrict who can
support or object to an intent. Not sure if that's used anywhere
currently, I suppose that was intended for contracts and the like.
* The provision that the action cannot be performed less than 24 hours
after an objection is withdrawn, which is an anti-scam measure.
* The Speaker's temporary veto (although with the recent CFJ that seems a