You ENDORSEd the person who would _otherwise_ be the last person to vote FOR, i.e., who would be the last person to vote FOR in the hypothetical scenario that you had not submitted that vote. If you had not submitted that vote, Jacob Arduino's vote endorsing you would have resolved to PRESENT, so the last person to vote FOR would have been V.J. Rada (unconditionally, so it's not affected by CFJ 3691).
-twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, December 3, 2018 1:52 AM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > Did I really vote FOR 8136? IIRC I ENDORSED the last person to vote FOR, and > someone else did as well (that may have been Jacob, who changed eir vote to > endorse me). Either way, I think that’s an inextricable conditional that > resolves to PRESENT. > > > On Dec 2, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote: > > I resolve the Agoran Decisions to adopt each of Proposals 8133-8138 as > > follows. > > -twg > > > > SUMMARY > > > > ======== > > > > This section self-ratifies. > > > > ID Author(s) Title Result > > > > -------------------------- > > > > 8133 Trigon Proposals aren't worth that much ADOPTED > > 8134 G. The judge switch ADOPTED > > 8135 twg, D. Margaux Blot Decay (Reprise) REJECTED > > 8136 V.J. Rada I hate myself REJECTED > > 8137 Aris, twg, Trigon Uncorrecting Rewards ADOPTED > > 8138 twg Access to contracts' assets REJECTED > > 10 ballots were cast on Proposal 8138, so Quorum on Agoran Decisions is > > now 7 except where otherwise stated. > > > > TALLY OF VOTES > > > > =============== > > > > This section does not self-ratify. Which is just as well really, because > > I bet someone will try to CoE it. > > > > +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > > | 8133| 8134| 8135| 8136| 8137| 8138| > > > > > > +----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > > |AI | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | > > |Quorum | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | > > +----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > > |Aris | FFF | FFF | FFF | AAA | FFF | FFF | > > |ATMunn PM| FFFF|+FFF | P | AAAA| FFFF| FFFF| > > |D. Margaux | | | |+AAA | | | > > |G. |+FFF | FFF | AAA | AAA |+FFF | AAA | > > |Gaelan |+FFF |+FFF | AAA |+FFF | P |+AAA | > > |Jacob Arduino |+FFF |+FFF |+AAA |+FFF |+AAA |+AAA | > > |pokes Z|+FFF | FFF | AAA | AAA |+FFF | AAA | > > |Telnaior |+FFF |+FFF |+FFF |+AAA |+FFF |+FFF | > > |天火狐 Z| FFF | FFF | FFF | AAA | FFF | AAA | > > |Trigon | FFF | P | AAA | AAA | FFF | P | > > |twg | FFF | FFF | FFF | AAA | FFF | AAA | > > |V.J. Rada 5b.| | | | FF | | | > > +----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > > |FOR | 31 | 27 | 12 | 8 | 25 | 10 | > > |AGAINST | 0 | 0 | 15 | 28 | 3 | 18 | > > |Ballots | 10 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | > > |Resolved |ADOP.|ADOP.|REJE.|REJE.|ADOP.|REJE.| > > +----------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ > > Key: > > PM Prime Minister > > Z Zombie > > > > - Extricated conditional > > x Inextricable conditional > > #b. Possesses # blots > > > > > > RIBBONS EARNED IN THIS RESOLUTION > > > > ================================== > > > > This section is purely informational and does not self-ratify. > > Player Ribbon Proposal(s) > > > > Trigon Orange 8133 > > G. Orange 8134 > > > > TEXT OF ADOPTED PROPOSALS > > > > ========================== > > > > This section is purely informational and does not self-ratify. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 8133 > > Title: Proposals aren't worth that much > > Adoption index: 1.0 > > Author: Trigon > > Co-authors: > > Amend rule 2496 by replacing the text "the total strength of all valid > > ballots", wherever it appears, to "the number of valid ballots". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 8134 > > Title: The judge switch > > Adoption index: 2.0 > > Author: G. > > Co-authors: > > Amend R991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing the paragraph beginning > > "When a CFJ has no judge assigned" with the following text: > > Judge is an untracked CFJ switch with possible values of any > > person or "unassigned" (default). To "assign" a CFJ to a person > > is to flip that CFJ's judge to that person. To "remove" or > > "recuse" a person from a being the judge of a CFJ is to flip that > > CFJ's judge from that person to unassigned. > > When a CFJ's judge is unassigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any > > eligible player to be its judge by announcement, and SHALL do so > > in a timely fashion. The players eligible to be assigned as judge > > are all active players except the initiator and the person barred > > (if any). The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all > > interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. > > If a CFJ has no judge assigned, then any player eligible to judge > > that CFJ CAN assign it to emself Without 3 Objections. > > [I think all instances of judge assignment/removal work with the > > above definitions, without further modification]. > > For every CFJ that was assigned to a judge immediately before this > > proposal took effect, that CFJ's judge switch is flipped to that > > judge. > > [Note: all old cases - however old - are still considered to have > > their last-assigned judge (judges are not "removed" when a case is > > closed). This is true both before and after this proposal]. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > ID: 8137 > > Title: Uncorrecting Rewards > > Adoption index: 3.0 > > Author: Aris > > Co-authors: twg, Trigon > > [ > > This is A.I. 3.0 because I don't know what Rule 2496's power is. > > Proposal 8127 "reenacted" it, meaning it acquires the power it had > > when it was originally repealed, but I wasn't around when that > > happened and it's not in the SLR yet. > > ] > > Amend rule 2496 by replacing all instances of the text "create in eir > > possession" with the word "earn". > > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
