On Sun, 2019-01-13 at 16:25 -0700, Reuben Staley wrote: > Please submit revision ideas for this proto-proposal. I'm pretty sure > it works this way, but I know there are other ways to do it. Also the > wording is terrible.
Should be a SHALL NOT on the promotor for resolving proposals out of order. Also, a "this proposal does not work unless" needs a pretty high power, which feels like it shouldn't be necessary for this. You might be able to get away with defining "this proposal is dependent on proposal X" to mean "this proposal can only pass if proposal X passes", but even that's on shaky ground if the proposal outpowers the rule. -- ais523
