Haven’t we had a CFJ about these sorts of apologies?

Gaelan

> On Feb 2, 2019, at 3:29 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [image: image.png]
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet
> annoyance persnickety pedantry mullet. I made an error because I had an
> oversight, I have shame, remorse, and ardent desire for self-improvement.
> 
> I expunge 2 blots from myself.
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 11:59 AM Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>> 
>> I Impose the Cold Hand of Justice by levying a fine of 2 blots on
>> CuddleBeam for Endorsing Forgery by not describing the error in the
>> document e intended to ratify. This has been reduced from the base value of
>> 8 blots because it was quite obvious from context what the error was, and
>> therefore this is a violation of the letter of the rules but not the
>> spirit. (It's also arguable that eir explanation of why e was intending to
>> ratify it was not "clear and plain", but again this was obvious from
>> context and so I won't try to figure it out either way because it doesn't
>> affect the fine. CFJ it if you really care.)
>> 
>> This violation is forgivable. CuddleBeam CAN, in a timely fashion, expunge
>> 2 blots from emself by publishing a formal apology of at least 200 words
>> containing the words "annoyance", "persnickety", "pedantry" and "mullet",
>> explaining eir error, shame, remorse, and ardent desire for
>> self-improvement.
>> 
>> -twg
>> 
>> 
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:46 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I point my finger at CuddleBeam for violating 2202/6:
>>> 
>>> A player SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to use Ratification
>> Without Objection to ratify a (prior to ratification) document containing
>> incorrect or Indeterminate information when a corrected document could be
>> produced with reasonable effort, unless the general nature of the
>> document's error and reason for ratifying it is clearly and plainly
>> described in the announcement of intent. Such ratification or announcement
>> of intent to ratify is the Class-8 Crime of Endorsing Forgery.
>>> 
>>> Gaelan
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Cuddle Beam cuddleb...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Ah, no worries. Ratification can be solved with ratification.
>>>> I intend to ratify without objection the following document:
>>>> The player Cuddlebeam has 1 Blot.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:21 PM Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red
>> wrote:
>>>>> You are a player and therefore not a fugitive.
>>>>> However, Kenyon indeed ought to have lost some blots - you're
>> correct that
>>>>> I didn't see that clause in the rules. Eir blots have self-ratified
>> into
>>>>> existence now but I will remember for next quarter. Thank you.
>>>>> -twg
>>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>>> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:18 PM, Cuddle Beam
>> cuddleb...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> "At the beginning of each quarter, half (rounded down) of each
>>>>>> fugitive's blots are destroyed."
>>>>>> "4. Agoran quarters begin when the Agoran months of January, April,
>>>>>> July, and October begin."
>>>>>> Why do I still have 3 Blots?
>>>>>> I expunge 1 Blot from myself
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:11 PM Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Date of this weekly report: 2019-01-29
>>>>>>> Date of last weekly report: 2019-01-21
>>>>>>> BLOT HOLDINGS
>>>>>>> ==============
>>>>>>> This section self-ratifies.
>>>>>>> Blots Person
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     10    Corona
>>>>>>>      7    Kenyon
>>>>>>>      5    V.J. Rada
>>>>>>>      3    CuddleBeam
>>>>>>>      3    Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>>>>>>      1    G.
>>>>>>>      1    L.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> RECENT HISTORY
>>>>>>> ===============
>>>>>>> This section is purely informational and does not self-ratify.
>>>>>>> Key:
>>>>>>> f Forgivable
>>>>>>> S Summary Judgement
>>>>>>> D Loses monthly salary for relevant office
>>>>>>> Person Change fSD Date (UTC) Reason Office
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- time of last report --
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2019-01-13 Expunged
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2019-01-06 Expunged
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2018-12-27 Expunged
>>>>>>> G. + 1 2018-12-17 Self-ratification
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2018-12-02 Expunged
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2018-11-25 Expunged
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2018-11-05 Expunged
>>>>>>> Murphy - 1 2018-11-04 Expunged
>>>>>>> V.J. Rada - 1 2018-11-01 Expunged
>>>>>>> CuddleBeam + 1 f 2018-11-01 Faking
>>>>>>> twg - 1 2018-10-23 Expunged
>>>>>>> Murphy + 2 D 2018-10-20 Late judge removal Arbitor
>>>>>>> twg + 1 2018-10-20 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> L. + 1 2018-10-20 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> CuddleBeam + 2 2018-10-20 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> ATMunn - 1 2018-10-11 Expunged
>>>>>>> Trigon - 1 2018-10-09 Expunged
>>>>>>> Trigon - 1 2018-10-04 Expunged
>>>>>>> Kenyon - 1 2018-09-28 Expunged
>>>>>>> Corona + 2 S 2018-09-28 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> Aris - 1 2018-09-24 Expunged
>>>>>>> Aris - 1 2018-09-20 Expunged
>>>>>>> Kenyon - 1 2018-09-17 Expunged
>>>>>>> Kenyon - 1 2018-09-16 Expunged
>>>>>>> Corona + 1 f 2018-09-16 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> V.J. Rada + 1 f 2018-09-16 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> P.S.S. + 2 SD 2018-09-14 Tardiness Herald
>>>>>>> Murphy + 2 S 2018-09-09 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> V.J. Rada + 2 S 2018-09-09 Late CFJ judgement
>>>>>>> Aris + 2 SD 2018-09-09 Tardiness Promotor
>>>>>>> Trigon + 2 SD 2018-09-01 Tardiness Cartographor
>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to