Y'all, y'all. *Shakes head.* Has anyone given Rule 869 a read lately?
It is read the ruleset week, so you might want to. Specifically, the
portion stating that "A person, by registering, agrees to abide by the
Rules. The Rules CANNOT otherwise bind a person to abide by any
agreement without that person's willful consent."? I could say more,
but I think I've said enough.
-Aris
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:36 AM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Oops—I think my earlier proposed amendment to G. would trivially give me the
> acting on behalf power. That wasn’t my intent.
>
> Instead I’ll propose this amendment to the contract I have with G:
>
> >
> > ////
> >
> > If twg’s attempts to make contract modifications today were EFFECTIVE, then
> > the text enclosed in brackets below is INEFFECTIVE.
> >
> > {
> >
> > The parties to this contract are the set of all players.
> >
> > D. Margaux CAN act on behalf of any party to this contract only to support,
> > object to, or withdraw objection to the intents that e announced on 9
> > February 2019 to ratify D. Margaux’s blot holdings to be 0, to award
> > degrees of associate of nomic to em and twg, and to declare apathy.
> >
> > }
> >
> > ////
