The standards can be degree-specific, too. If we follow the U.S. model, "an
essay that I've written before with a few extra comments after review" is
probably about right for an Associates degree but not anything higher.
On 2/13/2019 2:03 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
We have had some theses IIRC where someone wrote an extensive reply to someone
and decided to tack on a “I submit this for a degree” (in the same message).
But that’s not exactly the same thing
Gaelan
On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:23 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
To satisfy the "The Herald SHOULD coordinate the peer-review process
and the rewarding of the degree", I invite commentary including
suggestions on appropriate Degrees for this, if any, to be provided in
a timely fashion. I'll do my best to give comments myself. Then if
there is any commentary, I'd invite CuddleBeam's response. Once
that opportunity has been given, I'll start a 2 Agoran Consent process
(or two processes). Of course, players are free to start a Consent
process themselves but I'll personally keep to the SHOULD.
To start, a process question for people in general: Does this meet
the "original" criterion in R1367, as it was clearly written for
another purpose? (I'm not sure I have an opinion on that yet so I'm
interested in what people think. I wouldn't want to get bogged down
in this meta-discussion too much and this should be mostly about
content, but it's worth asking as this hasn't come up before AFAICT).
=The Herald
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:09 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
I submit the following essays for peer review and degree awarding:
Beginner's strategy guide for Blognomic:
https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=Beginner%27s_Strategy_Guide
AOV Nomic's history: https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=AOVNomic
(The titles are "X of Nomic", not "X of Agora Nomic" or the sort, and
essays about Agora, a certain nomic, have been submitted in the past, so
these are essays about other certain nomics too, for general nomic
interest.)
