> On Feb 18, 2019, at 8:15 PM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk" 
> <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Just to make sure you're aware: this can't change the Rules
> (penultimate paragraph of R105), just the rest of the gamestate.
> 
> This probably isn't a problem, unless past cleanings were broken (in
> which case it still isn't really a problem but we might want to retry
> the cleanings in order to make sure all our typos are gone). Dependent
> actions otherwise tend not to change the ruleset much, and proposal
> results self-ratify.

Maybe we can just ratify the Ruleset with the cleanings in them? This is such a 
mess lol. 

Reply via email to