> On Feb 18, 2019, at 8:15 PM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk" > <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > Just to make sure you're aware: this can't change the Rules > (penultimate paragraph of R105), just the rest of the gamestate. > > This probably isn't a problem, unless past cleanings were broken (in > which case it still isn't really a problem but we might want to retry > the cleanings in order to make sure all our typos are gone). Dependent > actions otherwise tend not to change the ruleset much, and proposal > results self-ratify. Maybe we can just ratify the Ruleset with the cleanings in them? This is such a mess lol.
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fa... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Reuben Staley
- DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fa... Madeline
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... Gaelan Steele
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not s... D. Margaux