Oh - sorry! I thought about it when the earlier results were in, and
I meant to ask if anyone would object to just calling it a tie. The
reason I didn't mention that in the last email was that the new series
of votes broke the tie.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:08 AM Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> To be honest, in a tie situation I would have expected you'd have given
> it to both of them. :P
>
> On 2019-02-27 02:02, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On 2/26/2019 2:59 AM, Madeline wrote:
> > > This actually untied the 3rd/4th race because twg had one primary
> > vote to
> > > CB's zero, but CB's just tied that again so oh well!
> >
> > Well, I kinda assumed 3rd was determined by re-evaluating the list order
> > after 1st and 2nd place winners were removed - that's not really well-
> > defined in the procedure (and what matters is how many people put CB
> > ahead
> > of twg). But also Gaelan's vote pulled Telnaior's out of conditional
> > status, so (assuming I'm not worrying about the length of the voting
> > period)
> > we got:
> >
> > D. Margaux: {Gaelan, Telnaior, twg, CuddleBeam}
> > ais523: {Telnaior, Gaelan, CuddleBeam, twg}
> > twg: {Gaelan, Telnaior, CuddleBeam, twg}
> > Falsifian: {Gaelan, Telnaior, twg, CuddleBeam}
> > G.: {Telnaior, Gaelan, CuddleBeam, twg}
> > Telnaior: {Telnaior, Gaelan, CuddleBeam, twg}
> > Aris: {twg, CuddleBeam, Telnaior, Gaelan}
> > Gaelan: {Gaelan, CuddleBeam, Telainor, twg}
> > CuddleBeam: {CuddleBeam, Gaelan, Telainor, twg}
> >
> > But this is by-the-by, as this was an advisory vote only. Even before
> > this
> > last round of late votes came in, I was thinking (in the event of a tie)
> > that I'd pick the person I didn't pick in my vote, thus tying my vote but
> > untying everyone's.
> >
> > Final order whether I count late votes or not (no more votes please!):
> > Gaelan, Telnaior, CuddleBeam, twg.
> >
