It definitely does, to my reading. Can you reread?

-Aris

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:27 PM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I hate to point this out after the distribution, but if I'm correct in my
> reading, this does not actually amend the rule. After this passes, won't
> intents still be broken?
>
> --
> Trigon
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 18:34 D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Pursuant to the Living Zombie contract, I hereby cause ATMunn to issue
> the
> > Cabinet Order of Manifesto to distribute the below proposal, initiating
> the
> > Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum
> is
> > 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and
> > AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes).
> >
> >
> > Proposal ID: 8164
> > Title: Correction to Agoran Satisfaction, Version 2.4
> > Author: Falsifian
> > Co-authors: ais523, D. Margaux, G., twg
> > Adoption Index: 3.1
> > Text:
> >
> > The gamestate, excluding the rules, is changed to what it would have
> > been if the text of the following amendment to Rule 2124 had determined
> > whether Agora was Satisfied with any intents attempted after Proposal
> > 7815, rather than the text of what Rule 2124 was at that time. To the
> > extent allowed by the rules, this change is designated as a convergence.
> >
> > Rule 2124 is amended by replacing its text with the following:
> >
> >      A Supporter of an intent to perform an action is an eligible
> >      entity who has publicly posted (and not withdrawn) support (syn.
> >      "consent") for an announcement of that intent. An Objector to an
> >      intent to perform an action is an eligible entity who has publicly
> >      posted (and not withdrawn) an objection to the announcement of
> >      that intent.
> >
> >      The entities eligible to support or object to an intent to perform
> >      an action are, by default, all players, subject to modification by
> >      the document authorizing the dependent action. However, the
> >      previous sentence notwithstanding, the initiator of the intent is
> >      not eligible to support it.
> >
> >      Agora is Satisfied with an intent to perform a specific action
> >      unless at least one of the following is true:
> >
> >      1. The action is to be performed Without N Objections, and there
> >         are at least N Objectors to that intent.
> >
> >      2. The action is to be performed With N support, and there are
> >         fewer than than N Supporters of that intent.
> >
> >      3. The action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, and the
> >         number of Supporters of the intent is less than or equal to N
> >         times the number of Objectors to the intent.
> >
> >      The above notwithstanding, if an action depends on objections, and
> >      an objection to an intent to perform it has been withdrawn within
> >      the past 24 hours, then Agora is not Satisfied with that intent.
> >
> >      The above notwithstanding, Agora is not satisfied with an intent
> >      if the Speaker has objected to it in the last 48 hours.
> >
> >      A person CANNOT support or object to an announcement of intent
> >      before the intent is announced, or after e has withdrawn the same
> >      type of response.
> > --
> > D. Margaux
> >
>

Reply via email to