> On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:36 AM, "ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk"
> <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> Ratification doesn't create paradoxes, though. The "compute what a
> retroactive change would do, then apply it" method of handling the
> change means that even if the cause of the ratification ends up being
> ratified away, the ratification still happened.
Ratification doesn’t create paradoxes, but no ratification has occurred here.
Instead, the situation here is:
1) The Assessor CAN and MUST resolve the proposal ADOPTED; and
2) As soon as the proposal is resolved ADOPTED, it takes effect (if it CAN take
effect) and it retroactively eliminates a necessary condition for its own
ADOPTION, thereby making it retroactively IMPOSSIBLE to resolve it ADOPTED.
The paradox exists until ratification, when the proposal is deemed distributed