On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:18 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>> You've missed an important point which will be elaborated on in my judgement 
>> of CFJ 3723. ATMunn did SPOOKILY distribute Proposal 8164, but it was 
>> nevertheless in the proposal pool when Aris redistributed it just now. I 
>> know this seems bizarre but please bear with me.
> I would be grateful for the chance to comment on a proto judgement before it 
> is finalized, since I am afraid i don’t yet see how this could be true.

To elaborate:

Under Rule 1607/44, “Initiating such a decision [whether to adopt a proposal] 
is known as distribution, and removes the proposal from the Proposal Pool.” And 
under Rule 2451, by issuing a Manifesto “The Prime Minister distributes a 
specified proposal in the Proposal Pool.”

“Distributing” a proposal by Manifesto necessarily removes it from the proposal 
pool under the definition of “distribution” set forth in Rule 1607. 

So if ATMunn distributed it, it’s not in the pool. 

Reply via email to