On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:18 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>>
>> You've missed an important point which will be elaborated on in my judgement
>> of CFJ 3723. ATMunn did SPOOKILY distribute Proposal 8164, but it was
>> nevertheless in the proposal pool when Aris redistributed it just now. I
>> know this seems bizarre but please bear with me.
>
> I would be grateful for the chance to comment on a proto judgement before it
> is finalized, since I am afraid i don’t yet see how this could be true.
To elaborate:
Under Rule 1607/44, “Initiating such a decision [whether to adopt a proposal]
is known as distribution, and removes the proposal from the Proposal Pool.” And
under Rule 2451, by issuing a Manifesto “The Prime Minister distributes a
specified proposal in the Proposal Pool.”
“Distributing” a proposal by Manifesto necessarily removes it from the proposal
pool under the definition of “distribution” set forth in Rule 1607.
So if ATMunn distributed it, it’s not in the pool.
