On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 5:49 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > and, therefore, any attempt to impose a fine was retroactively INEFFECTIVE.
...wow, that's strange. Why the heck is rule 2531 designed to make the gamestate (whether fines are EFFECTIVE, and thus indirectly people's voting power) depend on so many "soft" factors? Including the legality of actions, whether someone "more likely than not" performed an action (according to whom?), and even whether or not a fine is "blatantly and obviously unsuited".