A big question to me is whether such fixes should be retroactive? Probably not - that's what ratification is for. So one option (an even faster hotfix) is to allow anything that can be self-ratified to also be changable in a non-retroactive manner with 3 Agoran Consent. Maybe excepting votes!
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:47 AM ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/28/2019 11:19 AM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:>> For such > a decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the > >> adoption index is 3.0. > > > > I'm fairly sure there are more essential parameters than that (although > > some of them may be implied by the existence of an adoption index?). > > It'd be worth finding the whole list of essential parameters and > > ensuring that they're all specified by something. > > > I thought so too, but I was basing it off the proposal rules, which had > just this and the information about the proposal. I dunno, I'll have to > look into it some more.
