On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:01 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk <
ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 20:57 -0400, Jason Cobb wrote:
> > I'm new, and I've just started reading the rules, so please forgive me if
> > this is has an obvious answer.
> >
> > Can the Rulekeepor assign any ID numbers to rules that e wishes? I ask
> > because I noticed that the ID numbers of rules affect conflict
> resolution,
> > and there doesn't seem to be a way of assigning ID numbers specified in
> the
> > rules, thus giving the Rulekeepor some (small) amount of say in the
> > application of the rules.
>
> There used to be a rule enforcing a particular ID number allocation
> algorithm. It got repealed, though, so right now it's fully up to the
> Rulekeepor.
>
> I think that at the time, we were in an "office perk era" where
> officers were paid via giving them advantages like that one, because
> there wasn't a functioning economy, so the discretion didn't seem out
> of place. Some of the perk economy still survives, and I don't think
> it's doing any real damage.
>
> --
> ais523
>

Was that really a deliberate perk? It seems incredibly trivial, as perks
go. I was under the impression the old rule was repealed as part of a
simplification effort; lots of stuff was being repealed around then.

-Aris

>
>

Reply via email to