On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 12:10 -0400, Jason Cobb wrote: > Thanks, that's an interesting history. > I suppose this would be an issue easy to fix (by just striking the > bullet point), right?
Well, it's not doing anything negative at the moment, and might do something positive if Imminence ever gets defined again. I'd be inclined to just leave it. -- ais523
