On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:53 PM Jason Cobb <[email protected]> wrote:
> In my view, "inherent meaning" is a bit vague. I certainly could write
> up a document that suggests a change to the laws of my country, print a
> bunch of copies, and then start handing them out to everyone I know.
> That seems like it would fulfill a natural language meaning of
> "distributing a proposal".

Indeed, this wording refers to, but is not itself meant to codify, the
presumption that when the rules say something like "distribute a
proposal", they are creating a term of art rather than adopting a
natural language definition.

Reply via email to