Note from the Office of the Promotor:

Please don't use the > style quote formatting again. It makes text
formatting a nightmare, and stops me from wrapping lines.

-Aris

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:01 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, I meant to make it say "player" instead of "person who plays the
> game" anyway.
>
>
> I withdraw my most recently submitted proposal (again).
>
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup (v1.2)
>
> Author: Jason Cobb
>
> Adoption Index: 1.7
>
> Text:
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
>
> Replace the text
>
> >         The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> >         Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
> >         of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
> >         Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
> >         proceeding.
>
> with the text
>
> >         Subject to the provisions of this rule, the Referee CAN, by 
> > announcement,
> >         impose Summary Judgment on a player. When e does so, e levies a 
> > fine of
> >         up to 2 Blots on em. If e does not specify the number of Blots in 
> > the fine,
> >         the attempt to impose Summary Judgment is INEFFECTIVE. Summary 
> > Judgement is
> >         imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any 
> > official proceeding.
>
> }
>
>
> Jason Cobb
>
> On 6/18/19 7:55 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> > Instead of this:
> >
> >> The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> >>         Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by announcement.
> > I would recommend moving "by announcement" like so:
> >
> >> The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, by announcement 
> >> impose Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game.
> > Under the original wording it is ambiguous. Could have been read to say 
> > that SJ could be imposed on a person-who-plays-by-announcement.
> >
> >> On Jun 18, 2019, at 7:32 PM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Probably a good idea.
> >>
> >> I withdraw my most recently submitted proposal.
> >>
> >>
> >> I submit the following proposal:
> >>
> >> Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup (v1.1)
> >>
> >> Author: Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> Adoption Index: 1.7
> >>
> >> Text:
> >>
> >> {
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
> >>
> >> Replace the text
> >>
> >>>         The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> >>>         Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
> >>>         of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
> >>>         Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
> >>>         proceeding.
> >> with the text
> >>
> >>>         The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> >>>         Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by announcement.
> >>>         When e does so, e levies a fine of up to 2 Blots on em. If e
> >>>         does not specify the number of Blots in the fine, the attempt to
> >>>         impose Summary Judgment is INEFFECTIVE. Summary Judgement is
> >>>         imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in response to
> >>>         any official proceeding.
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> Jason Cobb
> >>
> >>> On 6/18/19 7:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >>> You might want to say that e must specify the number of Blots.
> >>>
> >>> -Aris
> >>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>> I submit the following proposal:
> >>>>
> >>>> Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup
> >>>>
> >>>> Author: Jason Cobb
> >>>>
> >>>> Adoption Index: 1.7
> >>>>
> >>>> Text:
> >>>>
> >>>> {
> >>>>
> >>>> Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
> >>>>
> >>>> Replace the text
> >>>>
> >>>>>         The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> >>>>>         Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a 
> >>>>> fine
> >>>>>         of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
> >>>>>         Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
> >>>>>         proceeding.
> >>>> with the text
> >>>>
> >>>>>         The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
> >>>>>         Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by announcement.
> >>>>>         When e does so, e levies a fine of up to 2 Blots on em. Summary
> >>>>>         Judgement is imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in
> >>>>>         response to any official proceeding.
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jason Cobb
> >>>>
> >>>>

Reply via email to