> > Fair point, and it's a matter of preference. This just seemed a bit
> > experimental for a full win mechanism to me.

Actually, I wonder if we should think about some kind of "debugging"
mechanism for victories.  Something like "when a win method is first
implemented (some mechanism, probably involving Agoran Consent, for
figuring out whether the first win was due to a win as intended or due
to finding a bug)".  If it was "win as intended" then champion,
otherwise you get a "debugging" title.  After a certain amount of time
that "debugging" goes away and it's a straight win - if you find a
loophole that nobody's spotted at the beginning, you deserve the full

(Now that I've written this, it's the sort of thing that's clear in
concept but really squishy to hard-code).

Reply via email to