On 8/4/2019 9:15 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> Yay, directly contradictory judgements.
> R2576 has never changed, so there's no reason for this contradiction, or to
> think that either judgement would be invalidated between the time it was
> issued and now.
> I don't know how I'm supposed to deal with that. Do I need to call yet
> another CFJ?

Since one didn't reference the other, yeah - a CFJ that mentions both of
those is probably needed now.

Or a ratification + legislative clarification and don't worry about what
the past state was.


Reply via email to