On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 14:55 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> [* do we need to define what a "hash method" is or is that in
> common-enough use to leave to common definitions?]

Fun though it would be to scam this myself, in the spirit of "catch
loopholes rather than exploit them": the common definition of "hash
method" is not what you're actually looking for here. (In particular,
you probably want to confine to hashes with collision resistance,
otherwise someone could prepare multiple plaintexts in advance and
choose which to show based on events since.)


Reply via email to