On 8/4/2019 3:21 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I'd say just enumerate the acceptable algorithms. You could probably just
> start with SHA256 - it's secure and easy to find calculators for online.

lol sure I suppose there's no point in coming up with an elegantly-crafted
general definition (as pretty as it might be) if it just amounts to "use SHA
256 or higher".

Reply via email to