On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:00 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
> On 8/8/2019 6:39 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>  > On 8/8/19 1:40 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>  >> Rule 9, by nch:
>  >
>  >
>  > Your Supreme Eminence, I humbly suggest that Rule 9 is INVALID due to its
>  > failure to contain the word "please" in the first paragraph following the
>  > opening brace, as required by Rule 6.
> And, Your Supreme Eminence, whether the invalidity of the Rule 9 returns
> the blessed ERIS to the formless chaos of "having not yet been mentioned"
> (thus potentially invalidating my most recent humble offering), given that
> the "mentioning" in Rules 3 and 4 is in "contest messages" which may or may
> not be affected by the validity of any Fantasy Rule contained in said
> messages.

(And before you answer, oh Great and Wise Pontifex Maximus, I feel
duty-bound to point out, humbly and with abasement, that historically
speaking, excluding ERIS from any celestial celebration is known to be
a Very Bad Idea).

Reply via email to