On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 22:50, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/2/19 6:22 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Not sure if it was clear, but if all went according to plan, you are > > currently in a superposition of having been brought to justice and having > > been exonerated. I'm trying to win by paradox. > > > > It occurs to me that that's all for nothing if the Arbitor delays the case > > until after the superposition resolves on the date of your future self's > > report, but historically e's been susceptible to light bribery...? > > > > -twg > > > I don't think the pledges affect the CFJ, since they were made after the > CFJ was initiated, if that was what you were going for. > > -- > Jason Cobb
Also, the judge can't know whether you will violate your pledges, so even if twg had pledged before calling the CFJ, I don't see how the pledges would help get a PARADOXICAL judgement. Shouldn't this just be DISMISS since "insufficient information" exists? We simply don't know whether the report is accurate. -- - Falsifian
