On 10/15/19 1:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
But are the dependencies you've identified truly circular? Many rules
have
multiple independent clauses that could very well be separated into
smaller
rules. If the "circularity" is created by a link to two entirely
separate
clauses within a rule, that could easily be separated without any
change of
function, is it really a circular reference to be concerned about?
-G.
Sure, that would be a valid solution for most of the cycles. Honestly, I
just thought it would be something interesting to analyze and talk about
(and apparently it was), so I put it in. I'm not trying to say it's a
crisis or anything.
--
Jason Cobb
