On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 at 06:09, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion <[email protected]> wrote: > *Sigh* I seriously think considering history to be a part of game state > may have been a mistake, but apparently there's now precedence for it...
I had assumed it wasn't until I did the research that became my thesis. I think it would probably be cleaner if it weren't. > This means that if any Rule changes need to be made to correct the game > state, then no mere proposal can emulate ratification in a succinct way > unless it is enabled by an even higher-Power/Precedence rule such as Rule > 1551 (Ratification, Power 3.1). I'm pretty sure no rule changes were purported to happen. Aris attempted to distribute Proposal 8277, but that doesn't change any rules. -- - Falsifian
