On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 18:03, Jason Cobb via agora-business <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Deputisation timeliness
>
> AI: 3
>
> Author: Jason Cobb
>
> Co-authors: Alexis
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2160 to read, in whole:
>
> {
>
> A player acting as emself (the deputy) CAN perform an action ordinarily
> reserved for an office-holder as if e held the office if
>
> 1. the player does not hold that office;
>
I have two other suggestions after thinking about how to reduce Cyan
Ribbon shenanigans and make it a more interesting thing to obtain that
genuinely requires working the officer's duties. First, make it so that a
player cannot have held the office in the preceding 14 days either; this
gives a space for another player to take the office so that a player cannot
immediately unresign and, more importantly, prevents a player from
resigning an office then immediately deputizing back into it for a Cyan
Ribbon. Suggested wording "The player has not at any point in the last 14
days held the office."
>
> 2. it would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the action, other than
> by deputisation, if e held the office;
>
Second, make it so that the person must not be already able to perform the
action. Suggested wording: "it would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform
the action, other than by deputisation, if e held the office, and, except
where the action is to publish information, would not be possible
otherwise;"
-Alexis
