i would like to know why in god's name have we gone from the 8000s to the 3000s with a letter on top, why not use the 9000s???
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:48 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official < [email protected]> wrote: > It has come to the attention of the Promotorial Proposal Office that > certain > proposals were incorrectly numbered. I apologize for this lapse. > All proposals numbered 35## are hereby renumbered 33##, where the final two > digits remain the same. Here is a revised index of proposals up for vote > (each of the decisions on whether to adopt them has a quorum of 6). > All players are hereby advised to treat these numbers as canonical from > the present moment forward, and to vote in reply to this index > as if it were an original distribution. > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1 > 8323* Jason 3.0 Secure Ribbons > 8324l Falsifian 2.0 Democratic unassignment > 8325e Falsifian 2.0 Inflation Vote > 3326* Falsifian 3.0 Attempted cleanup > 3327l Falsifian 1.0 Blink test v1.2 > 3328* Falsifian 3.0 The Eternal Sprit > 3329p Alexis 1.0 RtRW Reschedule > 3330* G. 3.0 No looting white ribbons > 3331j Warrigal 1.7 Promissory cleanliness > 3332f Murphy, Alexis 1.0 Switch Responsibility Responsibility > 3333l Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningful extra votes > 3334e Murphy, Alexis 2.0 Meaningless extra coins > 3335f Murphy 2.0 Consistent ADoP duties > 3336* Jason 3.0 Define "publicly" > 3337e Murphy 1.0 Fix Auctions > 3338l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 1) > 3339l Murphy 2.0 Clarify quorum (option 2) > 3340p Alexis 1.0 The Paradox of Self-Appointment > 3341* Alexis, G. 3.0 Support of the Person > > The proposal pool is currently empty. > > Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. > <ID># : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber. > <ID>e : Economy ministry proposal. > <ID>f : Efficiency ministry proposal. > <ID>j : Justice ministry proposal. > <ID>l : Legislation ministry proposal. > <ID>p : Participation ministry proposal. > > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8322 > Title: Unrepetition v1.1 > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: Alexis, twg > > > For each of Proposals 8287-8307, if the proposal took effect more than > once, then any changes to rule text caused by the second and later > times the proposal took effect are considered "extra" for the purposes > of this proposal. > > Reverse all such "extra" changes, in the reverse of the order in which > they occurred. > > [Comment: See > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-February/056587.html > for context. I think the changes this undoes are relatively benign, > but it's nice to have certainty about the state of the ruleset.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8323 > Title: Secure Ribbons > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Jason > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing the text "Ribbon Ownership is a > person switch" with the text "Ribbon Ownership is a secured person switch". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8324 > Title: Democratic unassignment > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > If Proposal 8320 (Promotorial Assignment) has been adopted, then amend > the rule entitled "Proposal Chambers" by replacing "If a proposal in > the Proposal Pool has its chamber unset" with "If the chamber of an > ordinary proposal in the Proposal Pool is unset". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8325 > Title: Inflation Vote > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > [Comments: > > Are we just going to let a steady stream of sufficiently dedicated > players claim their standard victories? I say we raise the bar a > little. > > There's been some talk of a larger re-working of the economy. In the > meantime, this proposal calls for players to vote on a new number to > replace the 1,000 coin victory fee. The median vote wins, favouring the > higher vote if there are two middle votes. > > ] > > For the purpose of this proposal: > > * An Inflation Ballot is a body of text published during the voting > period of this proposal that clearly, directly and without > obfuscation specifies a single non-negative integer and that it is an > Inflation Ballot. > > * Each player's Inflation Vote is the integer specified in the last > Inflation Ballot they published, or "none" if they never published > one. > > * P is the number of players with Inflation Votes other than "none". > > * Median is the (unique) integer such that that at least P/2 Inflation > Votes are integers greater than or equal to Median, and at least > (P/2+0.5) Inflation votes are integers less than or equal to Median. > > Amend Rule 2483 (Economics) by replacing "1,000" with Median, written > in decimal with commas separating groups of three digits, as in > "12,345,678". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 8326 > Title: Attempted cleanup > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > Repeal Rule 2604 ("Nothing to see here, Rule 1030,") and Rule 2600 > ("Boo!!"). > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3327 > Title: Blink test v1.2 > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2601 to read in full: > > If this is the only paragraph in this rule, and it has been at > least one week since this rule was last amended, then any player > CAN Close the Eye by announcement. When that happens, this rule > repeals itself. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3328 > Title: The Eternal Sprit > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Falsifian > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 869 by replacing the text "is a person" with "is forever a > person". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3329 > Title: RtRW Reschedule > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2327 (Read the Ruleset Week) by adding the following paragraph: > { > The above notwithstanding, due to serious uncertainty surrounding the > state of the rules during the scheduled Read the Ruleset Week, in the > year 2020, Read the Ruleset Week is, instead, the week of February 24 > - March 1 > } > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3330 > Title: No looting white ribbons > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: G. > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing: > A player who has been registered for at least 30 days > and has never caused another person to gain a White Ribbon > (including under a previous ruleset) CAN award a White Ribbon to > another person by announcement. > with: > A player who has been registered for at least 30 days > and has never acted on eir own behalf to cause another person to > gain a White Ribbon (including under a previous ruleset) CAN act > on eir own behalf to award a White Ribbon to another person by > announcement. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3331 > Title: Promissory cleanliness > Adoption index: 1.7 > Author: Warrigal > Co-authors: > > > Append the following paragraph to Rule 2450 "Pledges": > > The Notary CAN destroy a pledge Without Objection, and SHOULD do so if and > only if the pledge no longer serves any significant purpose. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3332 > Title: Switch Responsibility Responsibility > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: Alexis > > > Amend Rule 2603 (Switch Responsibility) by appending this text: > > The ADoP CAN appoint a player to such an office by announcement, > and SHOULD appoint the player primarily responsible for its > existence. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3333 > Title: Meaningful extra votes > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: Alexis > > > Amend Rule 2423 (First Among Equals) by replacing "voting strength is > increased by 1" to "voting strength is doubled". > > [I think this is a no-op due to Interesting Chambers, though.] > > Amend Rule 103 (The Speaker) by replacing "voting strength one greater > than e would have" with "voting strength twice what e would have". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3334 > Title: Meaningless extra coins > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: Alexis > > > Amend Rule 2483 (Economics) by appending this text: > > Upon doing so, eir remaining Coins (if any) are destroyed. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3335 > Title: Consistent ADoP duties > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2154 (Election Procedure) by appending to this text: > > If at any point an uncontested election has a single candidate, > then any player CAN by announcement declare em the winner of the > election, thereby causing em to win the election. If at any point > an uncontested election has no candidates, then any player CAN > declare the election ended with no winner by announcement. > > this text: > > In each of these cases, the ADoP SHALL so announce in a timely > fashion, unless someone else has already done so. > > [I think the recent resolutions of Treasuror and Tailor, while still > effective resolutions, didn't count as temporary deputisation because > the ADoP wasn't required to do them.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3336 > Title: Define "publicly" > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Jason > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 478 by appending to the paragraph beginning "A public message > is" the following sentence: > > To do something "publicly" is to do that thing within a public message. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3337 > Title: Fix Auctions > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 2549 (Auction Initiation) by replacing this text: > > An Auction also CANNOT be initiated unless the Auctioneer is able > to give away each item in each of the Auction's lots. > > with this text: > > An Auction also CANNOT be initiated unless the Auctioneer is able > to give away each item in each of the Auction's lots; however, if > the Auctioneer is Agora, then it CAN give them away at will. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3338 > Title: Clarify quorum (option 1) > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > If the author's proposal "Clarify quorum (option 2)" has been or > would be adopted with a greater proportion of support, then this > proposal has no effect. Otherwise: > > Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) by replacing "Agoran decision to adopt a > proposal" with "Agoran decision on whether to adopt a proposal". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3339 > Title: Clarify quorum (option 2) > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-authors: > > > If the author's proposal "Clarify quorum (option 1)" has been or > would be adopted with a greater or equal proportion of support, then > this proposal has no effect. Otherwise: > > Amend Rule 879 (Quorum) by replacing "Agoran decision to adopt a > proposal" with "Agoran decision that adopted a proposal". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3340 > Title: The Paradox of Self-Appointment > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 103 (The Speaker) by inserting > { > If the Prime Minister is emself Laureled, eir power to appoint a > Speaker continues for the entirety of a message in which e resigns as > Prime Minister, and if e is the only Laureled player, e CAN void that > power, and thereby discharge the obligation to use it, by announcing > that e declines to take the office. > } > > at the end of the second paragraph, and by moving the first two > sentences of the second paragraph to the first paragraph. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 3341 > Title: Support of the Person > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-authors: G. > > > Amend Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction) by: > > 1. Replacing "However, the previous sentence notwithstanding, the > initiator > of the intent is not eligible to support it." with "Announcing intent > to > perform an action implicitly announces support for that action; such > support may be withdrawn as per usual." > 2. Replacing "The action is to be performed With N support, and there are > fewer than than N Supporters of that intent." with "The action is to > be > performed With N support, and there equal to or fewer than than N > Supporters of that intent." > 3. Replacing "The action is to be performed with N Agoran consent, and > the number of Supporters of the intent is less than or equal to N > times the > number of Objectors to the intent." with "The action is to be > performed > with N Agoran consent, and the number of Supporters of the intent is > less > than or equal to O or less than N * O, where O is the number of > Objectors > to the intent." > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > -- >From R. Lee
