On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 14:50 Alexis Hunt via agora-business < [email protected]> wrote:
> [This first proposal is a reform to the core rules defining what rules > are, with an aim to better supporting subordinate legal documents. The > intent is to enact very little change to the game as it is actually > played, and to operate mostly in the realm of supporting definitions.] > Can you go into more detail about what problem this proposal is intended to solve or what goal it is intended to achieve? "Better support subordinate legal documents" is a pretty vague justification for such an enormous change. I like the "fundamentals" rules the way they are (except that it would be better if Rule 2141 "Role and Attributes of Rules" stated that although higher-power rules have the capacity to govern the game generally, lower-power rules' capacity to govern the game is limited by higher-power rules.) —Warrigal >
