On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 21:12, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 17:09, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 3. Definitions of specific types of decisions are meted out to lower-level > > rules or even subsidiary bodies of law, e.g. election procedure no longer > > needs to be tied in to high-powered rules. > > > > Oh this made me think of self-ratification and how we should fix that. > Letting decisions always self-ratify that they had a specific outcome would > a power that's safe to pass onto subsidiary law, but only if it's a legal > fiction and doesn't alter any preconditions). > > Do we have a preferred fix? I recall that someone (Falsifian?) submitted a > proto that I think I liked more than mine but I 'd have to go back to see > if that's true.
Maybe you mean my "Retroactive events" proto? https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-February/056594.html - Falsifian
