On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:31 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > On 4/26/2020 11:41 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote: > > I award myself Blue Glitter for this judgment. I self-file a motion to > > reconsider. I judge it FALSE again. I award myself Blue Glitter again. > > Ok, this is smack in the "why we can't have nice things/player discretion" > category. > > I resisted fixing this bug/feature because, so far, 9/10 self-filed > Motions to Reconsider represented genuine new work on behalf of the > judges, so was worth keeping the extra rewards in there, and players could > show restraint by not claiming second glitter for trivial reconsideration. > But it's apparent that constraint can't be kept now that it's noticed... > oh, well. (I don't mind the coins at all, but it's niggling as CotC > that this mucks up the permanent legal record for no real purpose). > > > Notice of Honour > -1 Alexis (for unnecessary reconsideration) > +1 Jason (a person deserving of Shogun) > > > I submit the following proposal, "Restraining Motions", AI-3: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing: > * Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time > limit to do so: 5 coins (Arbitor). > with: > * Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time > limit to do so, unless at the time of judgement the case was > open due to self-filing a motion to reconsider it: 5 coins > (Arbitor). > > > Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing: > Blue (B): When a person assigns a judgement to a CFJ, and has > never violated a time limit to assign a judgement to that CFJ, > that person earns a Blue Ribbon. > with: > Blue (B): When a person assigns a judgement to a CFJ, and has > never violated a time limit to assign a judgement to that CFJ, > nor ever self-filed a motion to reconsider that CFJ, that person > earns a Blue Ribbon. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > I think some change is necessary, but I think that keeping the reward for genuine reconsideration would be good. What about allowing the Tailor and Arbitor to determine whether it should be awarded and prohibit them from ever giving themselves such a reward?
