On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:42 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> What do y'all think of these? If there's a strong consensus for one or > the other, I'll only submit that one. > > -Aris > --- > Title: Rule Violations (option 1) > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): > > > If the author's proposal "Rule Violations (option 2)" has been or > would be adopted with a greater proportion of support, then this > proposal has no effect. Otherwise: > > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by appending at the end of > the > fourth paragraph: > Players SHOULD NOT violate the rules. > > --- > Title: Rule Violations (option 2) > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): > > > If the author's proposal "Rule Violations (option 1)" has been or > would be adopted with a greater proportion of support, then this > proposal has no effect. Otherwise: > > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by appending at the end of > the > fourth paragraph: > Players SHOULD NOT violate the rules doing so is manifestly in the > best interests of the game due to extraordinary circumstances. > I would vote against both because they both add text to the rules that we don't need and both are already perfectly implicit anyway. But I would greatly prefer the first one, given a choice (the second also has a typo, it is missing the word "unless") -- >From R. Lee
