On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 22:24, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 6/11/2020 2:48 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 6/11/20 3:29 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > >> > >> I submit the following proposal, "win indirection", AI-1: > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Amend Rule 2553 (Win by Paradox) by replacing: > >> > >> that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the game. > >> > >> with: > >> > >> that case's initiator, CAN, by announcement, Transcend Logic. When > >> a person transcends logic, e wins the game. > >> > >> > >> [This should make all wins in the rules indirect: Ribbons, > >> Tournaments, and Apathy are indirect already] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> > > Unfortunately I think Sets breaks this style. > > > > Yah I figured a Sets win was at least a month away (I hope!) so there > would be time - was thinking about the "proposals for a not-even-adopted > yet system" thing. :) > > But interestingly, if Falsifian's theory is correct, exactly 1 win method > would be allowed to be "direct", which would stop any other "direct" win > methods but still allow for indirect ones. So even if it isn't changed, > it's fine for now if the above proposal is adopted. > > -G.
Sets uses "by announcement". As long as winning the game is not associated with a fee anywhere in the rules, I don't see a problem. Still, I support extending this proposal to Sets after it passes, in case there still is a problem, and to keep a consistent style. - Falsifian
