On 6/13/2020 9:52 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > First of all, I think I should address a potential conflict of > interest with respect to CFJ 3831, that I am the recipient of the > karma in Murphy's message. I don't believe this represents a conflict > of interest because Murphy has subsequently acted to ensure that I > will receive this karma once and only once regardless of whether this > is found to have been effective. With regards to this, I also note > that the Honorable Arbitor did not view this as a conflict of interest > for the purposes of assignment and I was not barred from being the > judge by the caller, Aris, so others also seem to view this conflict > of interest as nonexistent. Now, let's get to the fun part!
Just on this point, when starting the moot I noticed that all the relevant records had been allowed to self-ratify before you were assigned the case (during the time that Alexis's first judgement remained un-mooted), so this judgement has no practical effect therefore no self-interest.
