R. Lee wrote:
Okay, you're right about the first one (side-eye @ falsifian) but the second one is surely just a response to a COE and republishing the first report, not a new monthly report right?
idk, it may be worth a CFJ. Most corrections probably fall within the same reporting period as the original report, in which case that alone is enough to prevent double salary. Regardless of how that shakes out, there's definitely value in recording corrections, as it allows for a quick check of whether a report was published within a given time period and may have self-ratified. (Also why I retained the practice of recording CoEs in the report; though thinking about that, maybe the report should also list denials, since they turn the self-ratification timer back on.)
