I agree! If Agora doesn't want me around, it is welcome to deregister me by proposal, which should be the only way to deregister someone without their consent.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:40 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 6/29/2020 8:05 AM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:50 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, I think the issue is that letting a person deregistered for crimes > >> back in the game sooner than a voluntary deregistrant is silly. Crime > >> deregistration should be a time out, I thought that was the main bug all > >> along. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Very biased, but I'm not at all sure it's silly. Someone who wishes to > play > > but has accumulated 40 blots, without doing any serious destruction of > the > > game (racial slurs, spam, repealing the entire ruleset, etc) is > > very different from someone who doesn't wish to play the game. > > > > Then blots shouldn't be an exile condition at all. Exile should be wholly > reserved for "this was bad enough that this person really shouldn't be > playing for a while". In fact, delinking exile from blots actually makes > sense now that we're shifting our view of blots - "exile" should now just > be a straight-up option for an indictment penalty. > > If bugs allow for gaming/profitability of exile, those are true bugs. For > example: given the existence of lockboxes, I think exile should (somehow, > it's hard) embargo/seize all of their locked possessions. > > -G. > > -- >From R. Lee
