Cool, the fact that it's you doesn't matter to the CFJ itself (we judge CFJs at the time they are called). Your vote was not withdrawn and your second vote did not count.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:01 PM Unspecified Behavior via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:51 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > On 6/30/20 6:57 AM, Becca Lee via agora-business wrote: > > > Whether or not the ballot satisfied the sixth condition for a valid > > > ballot is impossible to decide. This is because the anonymous player > > > was unsuccessful in retracting eir previous vote if e had cast one. To > > > quote rule 683 "an entity can by announcement withdraw... a ballot". > > > For an action to be taken by announcement, rule 478 tells us that the > > > actor "performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying > > > the action and announcing that e performs it." In this case, the actor > > > was taking the action of withdrawing a specific player's previous > > > ballot. For an action to be "unambiguous" and "clear" it must, at the > > > bare minimum, be possible to resolve, but this retraction is a > > > gigantic mystery. The recordkeepor simply doesn't know who to withdraw > > > the vote from, and no other Agoran knows either. I don't hold that > > > anonymous actions can never be ambiguous and clear, I simply hold that > > > in the specific case of withdrawing a specific person's ballot on an > > > Agoran decision, part of that action is obviously and integrally the > > > actor and their previous vote on the agoran decision (after all, a > > > vote never cast can't be withdrawn). So this action of withdrawing > > > fails. > > > > > > Well, you happen to be wrong that the recordkeepor didn't know whose > > ballot to withdraw. > > > > - The person controlling the unspecified.behav...@gmail.com email > address. > > > > > I affirm that I am the player commonly known as Jason. > -- >From R. Lee
