R. Lee: Unfortunately, this undid your most recent Parley. I suggest you
submit it again.
On 7/1/2020 7:45 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 6/27/20 5:49 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I intent, without objection, to ratify the following document:
{
This document is true as of 9:46 PM, June 27, 2020 UTC.
The contract known as "The Plunder Partnership" has the following text:
{
The Plunder Partnership
🏴☠️ WHO WE BE
The Plunder Partnership is also known as the Plundership. A party to this
contract is known as a Pirate. Any person who is not in Davy Jones’ Locker
can become a Pirate by announcement. Any Pirate can make themselves cease
to be one by announcement.
🏴☠️ NO TATTLE-TALES
Any person who has objected to a transferral of coins to the Plundership
are in Davy Jones’ Locker. A person in Davy Jones’ Locker cannot become a
Pirate, and they immediately cease to be a Pirate if they already were one.
🏴☠️ DOUBLOONS
Doubloons are a destructible asset that can only belong to Pirates. When an
amount of coins is transferred to the Plundership, each Pirate gains an
amount of Doubloons equal to the amount transferred divided by the amount
of Pirates, rounded down. A Pirate with at least 1 Doubloon can transfer 1
coin to themselves from the Plundership. Doing so destroys 1 Doubloon in
their possession.
🏴☠️ PARLEY
Any Pirate can propose a Parley by announcement, which describes amendments
to this contract. If a Parley was proposed at least 2 days ago, at least
2/3rds (rounded up) of all Pirates consent to its contents, and it has not
yet been applied, then any Pirate can apply it by announcement, causing
this contract to be amended according to it.
}
}
This document may or may not be true due to confusion about the state of
the contract, but the above is what is listed in the latest Notary
report. The nature of the document's error is that it may contain
platonically inaccurate contract text. The reason for ratifying this
potentially-incorrect document is to eliminate uncertainty about the
contract's text. [I believe this satisfies any requirements under R2202
to prevent me committing the Crime of Endorsing Forgery.]
Seeing no objection, I do so (ratify the above document).
--
ATMunn
friendly neighborhood notary here :)
